law

Thinking Outside the Box

Dear Joe,
This is an outstanding example of someone who has the capability of thinking “outside the “box”. Talk about funny?
Love,
Dad


Sierra Club vs. Wyoming Rancher

The Sierra Club and the U.S. Forest Service were presenting an alternative to the Wyoming ranchers for controlling the coyote population. It seems that after years of the ranchers using the tried and true method of shooting or trapping the predators, the Sierra Club had a “more humane” solution to this issue. What they were proposing was for the animals to be captured alive. The males would then be castrated and let loose again. This was ACTUALLY proposed by the Sierra Club and by the U.S. Forest Service. All of the ranchers thought about this amazing idea for a couple of minutes. Finally an old fellow wearing a big cowboy hat in the back of the conference room stood up, tipped his hat back and said; “Son, I don’t think you understand our problem here… these coyotes ain’t f*ckin’ our sheep… they’re eatin’ ’em!” The meeting never really got back to order. . .

ABCs of the FairTax

Dear Joe,
I would be in favor of this also except that no politician is going to want to give up a source of taxation, therefore, it will not fly. The reason for not giving up a source is claimed to be the need to have a broad based system, which means being sure to be able to tax every one to the fullest extent.
Love,
Dad


ABCs of the FairTax

A ALL federal income taxes and federal payroll taxes will be replaced with The FairTax, also called a consumption tax or a national retail sales tax.

B Brackets of taxation are eliminated. There is just one rate for everyone.

C Capital gains taxes are eliminated. More investment means more jobs.

D Death Taxes are eliminated, and keeping track of deductions is over.

E Everyone is taxed at the same rate of 23% on new goods and services.

F Foreign visitors will pay sales taxes (about $60 billion/year).

G Groceries and basic necessities are not taxed using the “pre-bate”.

H Hidden taxes hurt the poor more than the non-poor.

I IRS is eliminated and replaced with a Sales Tax Administration.

J Job creation in the USA would take off, because embedded taxes and taxes on corporate profits would be eliminated.

K Keeping the collection of taxes simple saves taxpayers billions of dollars annually, which is estimated to be about $250 billion or more.

L Liberals hate the idea because it gives people control of their money instead of government. Lobbyists will hate it also.

M More money for workers and businesses by eliminating compliance costs.

N No more income tax returns!

O Oppressive demands by the IRS would be eliminated!

P Pre-bate of expected sales taxes on basic necessities is based on family size and paid monthly to each family.

Q Quick passage by Congress is not likely without a massive demand by the voters.

R Repeal of the 16th Amendment would be in a companion bill.

S Spend more on stuff, you pay more in taxes.

T Two-thirds vote by the Senate would be required to change the 23% rate.

U “Underground economy” would pay taxes (billions!) like everybody else.

V Visibility of the federal taxes we pay would be crystal clear.

W Workers would control their lives and their “pursuit of happiness”.

X XL (extra large) economic growth would be unstoppable!

Y You decide how much you pay in taxes when you spend, not the government.

Z Zero rate of taxation on education expenses and Zell Miller would love it!

Remember Van T. Barfoot

Dear Joe,
It’s amazing how we are more likely to learn about someone when they do something wrong than when they do it right.
Love,
Dad


On June 15, 1919, Van T. Barfoot was born in Edinburg — probably didn’t make much news back then.

Twenty-five years later, on May 23, 1944, near Carano , Italy , Van T. Barfoot, who had enlisted in the Army in 1940, set out to flank German machine gun positions from which fire was coming down on his fellow soldiers. He advanced through a minefield, took out three enemy machine gun positions and returned with 17 prisoners of war.

If that wasn’t enough for a day’s work, he later took on and destroyed three German tanks sent to retake the machine gun positions.

That probably didn’t make much news either, given the scope of the war, but it did earn Van T. Barfoot, who retired as a colonel after also serving in Korea and Vietnam , a Congressional Medal of Honor.

What did make news last week was a neighborhood association’s quibble with how the 90-year-old veteran chose to fly the American flag outside his suburban Virginia home. Seems the rules said a flag could be flown on a house-mounted bracket, but, for decorum, items such as Barfoot’s 21-foot flagpole were unsuitable.

He had been denied a permit for the pole, erected it anyway and was facing court action if he didn’t take it down. Since the story made national TV, the neighborhood association has rethought its position and agreed to indulge this old hero who dwells among them.

“In the time I have left I plan to continue to fly the American flag without interference,” Barfoot told The Associated Press.

As well he should.

And if any of his neighbors still takes a notion to contest him, they might want to read his Medal of Honor citation. It indicates he’s not real good at backing down.

Van T. Barfoot’s Medal of Honor citation:

This 1944 Medal of Honor citation, listed with the National Medal of Honor Society, is for Second Lieutenant Van T. Barfoot, 157th Infantry, 45th Infantry:

“For conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of life above and beyond the call of duty on 23 May 1944, near Carano , Italy . With his platoon heavily engaged during an assault against forces well entrenched on commanding ground, 2d Lt. Barfoot moved off alone upon the enemy left flank. He crawled to the proximity of 1 machinegun nest and made a direct hit on it with a hand grenade, killing 2 and wounding 3 Germans. He continued along the German defense line to another machinegun emplacement, and with his tommygun killed 2 and captured 3 soldiers. Members of another enemy machinegun crew then abandoned their position and gave themselves up to Sgt. Barfoot. Leaving the prisoners for his support squad to pick up, he proceeded to mop up positions in the immediate area, capturing more prisoners and bringing his total count to 17. Later that day, after he had reorganized his men and consolidated the newly captured ground, the enemy launched a fierce armored counterattack directly at his platoon positions. Securing a bazooka, Sgt. Barfoot took up an exposed position directly in front of 3 advancing Mark VI tanks. >From a distance of 75 yards his first shot destroyed the track of the leading tank, effectively disabling it, while the other 2 changed direction toward the flank. As the crew of the disabled tank dismounted, Sgt. Barfoot killed 3 of them with his tommygun. He continued onward into enemy terrain and destroyed a recently abandoned German fieldpiece with a demolition charge placed in the breech. While returning to his platoon position, Sgt. Barfoot, though greatly fatigued by his Herculean efforts, assisted 2 of his seriously wounded men 1,700 yards to a position of safety. Sgt. Barfoot’s extraordinary heroism, demonstration of magnificent valor, and aggressive determination in the face of point blank fire are a perpetual inspiration to his fellow soldiers.”

New Light Bulbs

Dear Joe,
Please write to your congressmen suggesting that they revisit the subject of light bulbs. The new “squirley” bulbs do not give out as much as a comporable incandescent bulb and they do not fit many fixtures. They also cost a lot more and are dangerous. My experience is that you can buy sufficient regular bulbs to last longer than the proposed new bulbs at less cost. Besides that the legislators have no business interfering with the market choices. The new low flush toilets are another example of interference in an attempt to “go green” that does not work as intended.
Love,
Dad


A lighting expert has told a Senate committee that the federal government is endangering Americans by promoting new kinds of light bulbs to replace ordinary incandescent bulbs.

The Energy Independence and Security Act, signed into law by President George W. Bush in 2007, requires that bulbs be about 25 percent more efficient by 2014.

The act serves as a “de facto ban on traditional incandescent light bulbs,” said Howard Branston, who has overseen lighting projects including the Statue of Liberty and the Petronas Towers in Malaysia.

Testifying before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee on Thursday, Branston said compact fluorescent light bulbs, the most popular alternative to incandescent bulbs, pose a risk to public health.

“The compact fluorescent lamp contains mercury,” he said. “One gram of mercury will pollute a two-acre pond. This 2007 light bulb standard brings a deadly poison into every residence in the nation.

“We do not have enough knowledge of the potential consequences of being continuously exposed to the electromagnetic field that compact fluorescent lamps emit. There are millions of people in this country with lupus, an autoimmune disease. Exposure to low doses of light from these lamps causes a severe rash.”

Sen. James Risch, R-Idaho, said during the committee sessions: “Has anybody looked at the EPA recommendations put out in January 2011 about what you do if one of these mercury light bulbs breaks in your home? In Idaho, we’ve had a number of instances where they’ve had a mercury spill in a science laboratory and they immediately closed the school down.

“Can you imagine mercury bulbs throughout a school?”

Branston also warned about the use of LED (light-emitting diode) lamps, another alternative to incandescent bulbs, CNS News reported.

“The French have found that the output of these lamps is harming the vision of children,” he said. “They contain arsenic and other poisonous materials. Why aren’t we looking at that?”

He also asserted that the Energy Independence Act would cost jobs, burden businesses with the expense of updating lighting fixtures, and be an unnecessary government intrusion on Americans’ ability to choose the bulbs they want.

Sen. Mike Enzi, a Wyoming Republican, is promoting a bill to repeal the 2007 law and give consumers the choice to buy any light bulbs they want. His bill has the support of 26 senators — all Republicans.